top of page

Arxada: "Money good", but is there sufficient relative value given macro risks?

  • Writer: Jovan
    Jovan
  • Jan 9, 2023
  • 2 min read

ree

Investment Highlights

  • Leading global positions in several niche end markets, many with barriers to entry and secular growth trends

  • Strong product portfolio of registered actives and regulatory assurance capabilities

  • Strong R&D capabilities with large pipeline of new products

  • Global manufacturing footprint in close proximity to diversified customer base

  • High, stable gross margins via pass throughs mechanisms or pricing power leading to strong cash generation

  • Adequate short-term liquidity of c. CHF 370m with long dated maturity profile

  • Experienced management team led by Marc Doyle PhD, former CEO of Dupont and former COO of Specialty Products division and Peter Frauenknecht, CFO, former CFO of successful carve-out Atotech Group

  • Well capitalized Tier 1 sponsors with chemicals expertise and solid track record of executing carve-outs and realizing synergies from bolt-ons


Risks & Mitigants

ree

View


GOOD business with BAD balance sheet facing TEMPORARY macro headwinds. LOW refinancing risk given business profile and long dates maturities...

ree

...but SIGNIFICANT capital depreciation risk remains. On balance, INADEQUATE risk-adjusted return on a relative value basis for LARGE INVESTMENT at this time.


Recommendation


Given macro headwinds and relatively low yields, recommend to be UNDERWEIGHT in single B chemicals. However, if necessary for portfolio diversification...

ree

... and revisit in the future depending on their financial and instrument trading performance.


Illustrative Future Scale Investment Scenario


ree

Background


  • On July 1, 2021, Bain Capital & Cinven carved out Arxada (formerly Lonza Specialty Ingredients), a global anti-microbial and specialty chemicals company, from Swiss chemicals company Lonza at an EV of c. CHF 4.2bn (9.6x FY20 PF adj. EBITDA)

  • The transaction was funded by c. CHF 2.7bn in capital markets debt (6.2x leverage/5.0x senior secured) and c. CHF 1.5bn (36%) in sponsor equity

    • CFR is currently B3/B

    • CHF 71m in synergies (c.80% COGS) are expected to be realized by FY22 with CHF 52m realized as at Q3 FY 22

  • In December 2021, the company rolled up Enviro Tech (food, beverage and water protection) and Troy (industrial anti-microbial products) for $670m and $450m respectively

    • Their combined FY21 PF EBITDA was CHF 70m

    • The acquisitions were primarily funded by CHF 720m debt and rolled management equity

    • c. CHF 60m in synergies (primarily SG&A) are expected to be realized by FY23

  • In spite of acquired EBITDA, total leverage has increased to the Q3 FY 22 level of 6.5x (5.4x senior secured)

Company Profile


ree

Recent Developments

ree

Ownership & Management

ree

Industry Summary

ree
ree

Historical Financial Performance

ree

Current Trading (Q3 FY22)

ree

Projections


Base Case

ree

ree

Break Case

ree

ree

Relative Value


Leveraged Loans:

ree

High Yield:

ree

Appendix


Valuation (Break Case)

ree

Corporate Structure

ree

 
 
 

2 Comments


FM
FM
Jan 09, 2023

Interesting. A couple of points:


- I'd run valuation on EBITDA less maint Capex (maybe conclusions won't change but I'd look at it that way).

- Business is large, diversified, with 2 large sponsors behind it. In the break case CHF 50m of cash would not be an issue.

- It seems that they have track record in realising cost savings YTD so the EBITDA of CHF 516m is credible; would be good to see if there are any other adjustments which would not be possible to carry forward in a refinancing with current docs (eg revenue synergies)

- The risk of gas prices skyrocketing again and impacting production of fertilisers / chemicals remain (unless not an issue for Arxada…


Like
Jovan Alston
Jovan Alston
Jan 09, 2023
Replying to

Appreciate the feedback Federico. Responses below:


1. Senior debt is 100% covered based on a distressed valuation using EBITDA - maintenance CAPEX.

2. Agree that even in the rather draconian break case sponsors would still step in given the sound underlying business model/recovery prospects. Purpose of the case was to illustrate the robustness of the business/cash flows.

3. There were no revenue synergies projected (only COGS/SG&A).

4. Agree future energy costs (5% of sales in FY22 ) are difficult to model. Arxada's energy costs are typically 4% of revenue (driven mostly by Performance Intermedaries & Chemicals ("PI&C") segment.

5. Agree holdco yield seems low but goes to show the market may like this credit a bit too much.

Like
bottom of page